Saturday, April 18, 2009

Mall Report

Since General Growth filed for bankruptsy the other day I thought I'd give my impressions on that. I posted the report without giving my take on it. I should state here that my opinions are my own and do not represent those of GGP or its subsudaries.

Lately, since the beginning of the year, new tenants have been taking to reusing the walls and not even bothering to remodel when they are moving in. Save a lot of money that way, but gives a rather jakey look.

We have lost several stores in the past couple of months. Z-Galleria pulled out of Missouri and other markets, but is still in business. This leaves a gap on the second level at the Atrium, which is our main entrance court. That kind of detracts but what can we do?

Mark Shale, the entire chain is going under, which leaves a new, significant gap on the north end of the mall. The North end has been a dead zone with the second level having two empty spaces and the former Houlihan's restaurant empty since they moved out a couple of years ago. (Not that I was unhappy to see THEM go. I hate drunks and druggies, which Houlihan's attracted. I get the feeling that the drug dealers used it as a meeting place since there were license plates from all over including a state plate from Mexico).

However, we have had a few move in's. Stacey Adams is a clothing store That moved into the old Discovery Channel Store space. They look like high end, Italian, "Mafia" clothing for men. Some of it looks tasteful, but I am not impressed.

San Francisco Music Box Company moved into the old Disney store space. I must say I am impressed. They were able to reuse the little bit of exterior lighting that Disney left which was a kind of frame around the perphery of the window which has a star effect. When its lighted the stars change as you pass by. They are only using half the space with a frame holding a curtan to the unused portion of the store to the back. Still, its a tennant and its putting money in the Mall. The Music Boxes are really pretty and I hope people buy them.

Toy Tyme is a toy store that usually comes and uses unused spaces every Christmas and is usually gone by Janruary 31. This year, they are staying. Not sure how, but I think the mall is giving them an incentive to stay. They had the Discovery Channel space, but moved into the old Club Libby Lu space when that was abandoned. They sell toys obviously, but they are kind of decoratve, high end things that look good from a decorators standpoint, but I wouldn' let a five year old touch. They sell these realistic looking stuffed animals. Sometimes at night I can walk by and look at the dog sitting and I swear I think the thing is gonna bark! Kinda unnerving.

The construction has stopped which leaves us looking like a construction zone. This huge dirt gap on the parking lot makes us look really bad, but there is nothing really we can do about it. My major concer is taht they stopped the Parking garage expanstion construction literally days before finishing it. They had some minor masionary work to do, space striping and the expantion joints. The expantion joints are my biggest concern since any water that gets into there can cause permanant damage to the structure by promoting rust of the reinforcement bars and post-tensioning cables. It has gone through a whole winter with rainwater and snow being pumped into it by nature. Its going to severely decrease the lifetime of the structure if it isn't fixed. I have to wonder about the mentality of not finishing just that. Its just so idiotic.

Right now, we have two empty spaces on the north end second level. I have already mentioned Mark Shale and the Houlahans spaces. We have the old White House - Black Market space still empty. (They moved into the Brooks Brothers Women's space when Brooks Brothers consolidated all the stores into one). The Z-Gallerie space level two I have mentioned. Then the old Road store, which went out of business before Christmas last year.

All in all, since we have about 165 stores according to the website, we are doing relatively well considering. What will tell will be the next few months assuming that GGP can get its financial act together. In this real estate climate, buyers are few and are looking for bargans. I seriously doubt they will get the $27.5 billion they need to get back to solvency. I seriously think their assets will eventually be auctioned off and there will be developers that will pick up properties for a song. GGP's investors will end up holding the bag for this unfortunately.

There is little sympathy for retail facilities in the present government attitude. GGP is very unlikely to get a bail out even though a large scale closure of its facilites would have a grave impact on retail from coast to coast. The economy would suffer a significant impact if this happened.

So where does that leave us, the workers. It leaves us apprehensive about our futures, and wondering if our paychecks will clear. What can you do?

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Its finally Happened.

General Growth files for bankruptcy protection


Thu Apr 16, 2009 5:34am EDT

* Seeks to extend mortgage maturities

* Obtains $375 mln in debtor-in-possession financing

By Emily Chasan and Ilaina Jonas

NEW YORK, April 16 (Reuters) - General Growth Properties Inc GGP.N, the second largest U.S. mall owner, on Thursday filed for bankruptcy protection on Thursday, making it one of the biggest real estate bankruptcies in U.S. history.

Ending months of speculation, the Chicago-based mall owner which listed total assets of $29.557 billion and total debts of $27.294 billion, sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection from creditors along with 158 of its more than 200 U.S. malls, while it seeks to restructure some of its debt.

The company said in a statement that it plans to continue exploring strategic alternatives during the bankruptcy protection and is seeking to emerge as quickly as possible through a reorganization that preserves its national business.

General Growth's filing in the U.S. bankruptcy court in Manhattan makes it one of the largest non-financial companies to succumb to the financial crisis in the U.S.

Prior to the bankruptcy protection filing, the company had defaulted on several mortgages as well as a series of bonds. It has also put several of its flagship properties up for sale.

General Growth has been generating enough cashflow for the company to pay monthly interest costs and expenses but it has been unable to refinance the principal of loans and mortgages as they come due because banks and other financing sources have been reluctant to issue large mortgages and loans.

"Our core business remains sound and is performing well with stable cash flows," said Adam Metz, General Growth's Chief Executive, in a statement.

"While we have worked tirelessly in the past several months to address our maturing debts, the collapse of the credit markets has made it impossible for us to refinance maturing debt outside of chapter 11."

General Growth has received a commitment for a debtor-in-possession financing facility of about $375 million from Pershing Square Capital Management L.P., as agent.

The hedge fund, run by William Ackman also owns about 25 percent of General Growth shares. He has been urging the company to file for bankruptcy protection and described it as "a great company" with "phenomenal assets" at a conference on April 2.

At the end of the 2008, about $15.17 billion of General Growth's debt was comprised of mortgage loans that had been securitized into commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS), according to research firm Trepp.

"This underscores that real estate companies are most vulnerable to refinancing risk rather than market risk. The US insolvency process is, we think, a cure for General Growth's liquidity problems, which stem from external factors, and not a traditional bankruptcy per se," said Nomura's London-based property analyst Mike Prew.

Although shares of General Growth had traded as high as $44 over the past 12 months, the stock deteriorated as the credit crises worsened. Shares closed at $1.05 in the U.S. Wednesday.

HIGH QUALITY MALLS AND TENANTS

The Chicago-based firm started when brothers Martin and Matthew Bucksbaum decided to expand the family grocery business and build a shopping center in Cedar Rapids, Iowa in 1954.

It grew by new development as well as by acquisition, the largest being the 2004 purchase of Rouse Cos for $14.2 billion which brought the company 37 of the best quality and most valuable malls in the country including Fashion Show in Las Vegas and Faneuil Hall Marketplace in Boston.

General Growth's refinancing troubles in the frozen credit markets led to the firing of its former chief financial officer Bernard Freibaum in October. John Bucksbaum, who succeeded his father Matthew in 1999, stepped down as chief executive the same month, though he remained chairman.

In recent months, the new management team under Metz has been wrestling with loan after loan coming due, bargaining for extensions. As of the end of 2008, General Growth had $1.18 billion in past due debt and an additional $4.09 billion of debt that could be accelerated by its lenders.

Earlier this month, the company had been seeking to restructure $2.25 billion of Rouse bonds, offering bond holders a percentage on their bonds if they allowed the company to skip interest payments and principal until the end of the year. But the company failed to garner the necessary support it needed.

General Growth said several of its other subidiaries, in addition to the malls were also placed into bankruptcy protection, while several of its properties that are part of joint ventures were unaffected.

The company has hired law firms Weil Gotshal & Manges and Kirkland & Ellis to represent it, according to court papers.

The case is In re: South Street Seaport Limited Partnership, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York, No. 09-11963.

(Reporting by Ilaina Jonas, Emily Chasan; editing by Elaine Hardcastle)

� Thomson Reuters 2009 All rights reserved

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Keep this man's family in your prayers.

As many of you are aware, I work nights as a Security Officer here in the area. Today they had a guard shot and killed at a grocery store. Kinda gives me a pause. Then again, what happened to that guard can't happen to me. I am unarmed and what happened is that the subject this particular guard was dealing with got hold of the guards' weapon and used it against him. Still, he worked for Schnucks and I have a colleague that works for us on the weekend who also works at Schnucks. I don't think it was my colleague, but the picture was kinda fuzzy.

With the economy like it is, I think we are going to see a lot more incidents like this happening. It gives me another thing to keep me up during the day thinking about what cna happen in my job. I can't let it stress me out, but I am so glad I don't work tonight.

Monday, April 6, 2009

This make me want to join the torches and pitchforks brigade!

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04032009/watch.html

If your understanding of the present financial debacle is not changed by watching or reading the video on this page, you aren't thinking. I am so incensed by this I am not thinking straight. I know I will have something better to say, but just watch.

William K. Black: CSI Bailout
Watch Video
Read Transcript
Comment
April 3, 2009

William K. Black suspects that it was more than greed and incompetence that brought down the U.S. financial sector and plunged the economy in recession — it was fraud. And he would know. When it comes to financial shenanigans, William K. Black, the former senior regulator who cracked down on banks during the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s, has seen pretty much everything.

Now an Associate Professor of Economics and Law at the University of Missouri, William K. Black tells Bill Moyers on the JOURNAL that the tool at the very center of mortgage collapse, creating triple-A rated bonds out of "liars' loans" — loans issued without verifying income, assets or employment — was a fraud, and the banks knew it.

And while there is no law against liars' loans, Black points out that there are, "many laws against fraud, and liars' loans are fraudulent. [...] They involve deceit, which is the essence of fraud."

Only the scale of the scandal is new. A single bank, IndyMac, lost more money than the entire Savings and Loan Crisis. The difference between now and then, explains Black, is a drastic reduction in regulation and oversight, "We now know what happens when you destroy regulation. You get the biggest financial calamity of anybody under the age of 80."

>>More from William K. Black about the The Prompt Corrective Action Law

>>More about the Savings and Loan Crisis

Biography
William K. Black, author of THE BEST WAY TO ROB A BANK IS TO OWN ONE, teached economics and law at the University of Missouri — Kansas City (UMKC). He was the Executive Director of the Institute for Fraud Prevention from 2005-2007. He has taught previously at the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin and at Santa Clara University, where he was also the distinguished scholar in residence for insurance law and a visiting scholar at the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics.

Black was litigation director of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, deputy director of the FSLIC, SVP and general counsel of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, and senior deputy chief counsel, Office of Thrift Supervision. He was deputy director of the National Commission on Financial Institution Reform, Recovery and Enforcement.

Black developed the concept of "control fraud" — frauds in which the CEO or head of state uses the entity as a "weapon." Control frauds cause greater financial losses than all other forms of property crime combined. He recently helped the World Bank develop anti-corruption initiatives and served as an expert for OFHEO in its enforcement action against Fannie Mae's former senior management.

Published April 3, 2009. Guest photos by Robin Holland



Another news item of note:

UBS grounds foreign desk managers

Switzerland's biggest bank, UBS, has banned company managers who deal with foreign clients from travelling abroad, as a US fraud investigation continues.

The Swiss bank is being investigated by the US authorities over alleged fraud and tax evasion involving US citizens.

UBS denied the travel ban had been put in place specifically to protect senior staff from American authorities.

US officials have accused UBS staff of helping American clients hide money in offshore accounts.

The bank earlier gave them the names of some 300 Americans it has advised, but refused to identify 52,000 others.

In February, UBS agreed to pay $780m (£525m) to the US government to settle allegations that it had defrauded US tax authorities.

It is estimated that the US government loses $100bn in revenues every year because of tax havens.

'Humiliation'

The move at UBS confirms widespread media speculation that it and other Swiss banks are imposing travel bans on their staff for fear of falling foul of an international crackdown on tax havens, the BBC's Imogen Foulkes reports.

UBS said it was in the process of reviewing its wealth management policy and that for the foreseeable future, contact with clients would be confined to e-mail and telephone.

The travel ban is yet another worrying signal from UBS, our correspondent says.

It is still reeling from enormous sub-prime losses and is at the centre of the widening US investigation into alleged tax fraud by US citizens.

Although Switzerland has now agreed to comply with international guidelines and lift banking secrecy in tax evasion cases, it has not put the new policy into practice yet.

The UBS travel ban is perhaps sensible, our correspondent adds, but it is also a major humiliation.

UBS is the world's biggest wealth manager, its slogan was "UBS You & Us", and it prided itself on its personal face-to-face approach.

Now its managers can contact foreign clients only by phone or e-mail.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/business/7984794.stm

Published: 2009/04/05 21:42:17 GMT

© BBC MMIX

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Went to DFW last week.

I went to DFW and helped my friend move last week, which is why I wasn't here all last week. I got to meet the wonderful and beautiful Zusiqu who took me to Stephanie's. I am just sorry I didn't get a chance to have dinner with her, but I was so busy and since Steph is sick with cancer I have to take advantage of the well times when we can. Steph has her good days and her bad days and you have to take advantage of them when you can.

Moving is not fun, but Stephanie doesn't have much and we sorted it and got it into storage. We have a nice apartment picked out for her next to a hospital which will be great for her. Its not her hospital, which is St. Paul's in Dallas, but its nice to know its there for emergencies. Her new apartment looks like a castle! The rent is outstanding. Its low so it will help her with a lot of financial things that are happening soon with her, including her medical bills.

I'll write more later, but I want all of you to have Stephanie in your prayers. Her prognosis is not good and she needs all the prayers she can get. Thanks all of you for being good friends.

Where are the moonies? Read the Washington Times

Published on BuzzFlash.org (http://buzzflash.com/articles)

Rev. Moon Exemplifies Right Wing GOP Subsidy of Big Media to Frame Message

Created 03/29/2009 - 9:59am

THE BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG

By Mark Karlin

Rev. Moon has adopted a relatively low-profile in recent years (if you don't count his bizarre "coronation" by elected officials in a Capitol Hill House of Representatives meeting room a couple years back), but that hasn't prevented the weird religious leader (and close ally of the Bush family) from pouring an estimated 1 - 2.5 billion dollars into subsidizing the Washington Times since 1982.

In 2002, Rev. Moon pronounced "The Washington Times will become the instrument in spreading the truth about God to the world." But the reality is that the Washington Times -- like the New York Post and Weekly Standard for Rupert Murdoch -- are investments in obtaining financial regulatory and other favors from Republican administrations in return for helping frame and market the GOP talking points of tax cuts, cultural wars, and Wall Street gambling.

The Washington Times has only about 100,000 subscribers, but its newsboxes are next to the Washington Post throughout D.C., allowing it to appear as an equal -- and to have its banner headlines seen by tens of thousands of D.C. "influencers" every day. Then, it also gives a byline and title for its writers to appear as D.C. pundits on television (just as Bill Kristol is identified as editor of the chronically money losing "Weekly Standard" during his ubiquitous "pundit" appearances on the tube) -- as well as all television reporters need to quote it to provide "balance."

In short, Moon, in essence, shells out hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars to use the Washington Times as a public relations vehicle for "framing" the GOP perspective. The Washington Times doesn't have the incendiary flamboyant impact of Rush Limbaugh, but it has played a vital role in moving the "frame" of what is considered "centrist" in the U.S. among D.C. insiders way to the right.

Just last week (March 23), it was announced that the Washington Times is going to launch a radio program: [1]

The Washington Times is headed for radio. In a partnership announced Monday (March 23) with Talk Radio Network, the paper plans to launch later this spring a nationally syndicated, three-hour, morning-drive radio show (6 a.m. to 9 a.m. ET) aimed at showcasing the paper's investigative reporting and accountability journalism.

The move is part of the paper's strategy to transform itself into a multimedia, multiplatform news company. According to Nielsen Online, unique users of The Washington Times Web grew 39 percent in February, compared to a year ago.

"We believe this unique journalistic team, combined with radio’s ability to give the time and context needed to flesh out breaking stories, will make for a powerful winning combination in talk radio," said Mark Masters, CEO of Talk Radio Network. “Rather than commenting on yesterday’s news, this news show will have the capacity to make, break and drive the news cycle. Like 60 Minutes once did for TV, this show can do for radio. We are very excited and honored to embark in this partnership with The Washington Times investigative team

If you want a little insight into how the pieces of the right wing media echo chamber puzzle fit together, it is worth looking at some of the people under contract to Talk Radio Network: [2] Michael Savage, Laura Ingraham, Rusty Humphries, Monica Crowley, and Tammy Bruce. Bruce most recently made an infamous remark calling the Obamas trash, and Tammy Bruce managed to insult the entire nation of Canada a couple of weeks ago, resulting in an unprecedented Ottawa call for an apology from FOX "News."

Talk Radio Network, on its website, describes the new radio venture with the Washington Times this way:

March 23, 2009 - TALK RADIO NETWORK, THE WASHINGTON TIMES TO LAUNCH INVESTIGATIVE RADIO SHOW NATIONALLY.

Talk Radio Network and The Washington Times are partnering to create a nationally syndicated, morning-drive radio show with an innovative new format aimed at showcasing investigative reporting, accountability journalism and live reporting directly from the Times' newsroom inside the nation's capital. The Washington Times Morning Show is set to launch later this spring.

When you read the term "investigative reporting" applied to the Washington Times, think about the Clinton impeachment. To say the least, there was no investigating of the Bush Administration multiple illegalities going on by Rev. Moon's media empire, just cover-ups.

By the way, for a couple of billion dollars -- as the Washington Times tries to claim it doesn't let bias or partisanship get in the way of its "news" coverage -- Rev. Moon can indulge himself in launching a Washington Times blog [3] that is called, "TheConservatives.com: Reinventing the Right."

Meanwhile, wealthy liberal Democrats don't buy up or create large media outlets; they just support efforts to criticize the corporate press and the likes of Rev. Moon. And the only other daily in D.C. is the pro-war Washington Post, which is the voice of the status quo self-appointed punditocracy. It's like a right leaning Democratic Leadership Council.

You can win elections, but you can't make dramatic change unless you own part of the major media.

Rev. Moon understands that. Why can't wealthy Democrats?

Or is it because many of the wealthiest Democrats really don't want a change in the distribution of wealth in this nation?

Good question.

THE BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG


Links:
[1] http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/content_display/news/local
[2] http://www.talkradionetwork.com/

Thursday, March 19, 2009

If a company is too big to fail

If its too big to fail, then the government should be in charge. Above a certain limit, there is a real danger that one large company could cause the cascade failure of the economy. That's been the problem the last few years. The very real danger that business consolidation and monopolies cause a great danger to the economy by the very possibility of failure. What we have seen in that past few years is the object lesson of this.

Theoretically, if the government controlled a large entity that is "too big to fail," then the accountability factor would increase. The operators of said entity would have to report to congress and/or other government entities and committees and be subject to scrutiny by the public.. The real sad comment on this whole debacle is that the regulators were in many cases sleeping at the switch or defunded to the point of impotence by a government hell bent on driving the economic engine for all its worth. The Republicans and to a lesser extent the Democrats that played along with them, bear a large blame for what happened. By dismantling all the careful controls on the markets put in place by the Roosevelt Administration in the wake of the Great Depression, the supply-siders brought forth a great period of economic growth. They also made a monster that grew to a point where its failure was inevitable. Bubbles eventually burst, fragile things that they are.

However, the very problem with government at this point is that the partisans are interested in preserving their ideology even at the expense of the people. Witness the governors of the various states who are refusing to accept stimulus money that may, in the end, benefit their own people on ideological grounds. I sense that many of these ideologues will be looking for a job come next election cycle.

The accountability factor is very important. Most board minutes are generally not seen by the public. Corporations conduct their business with a bureaucracy that is interested in the short run. Business lost sight of long term planning and expansion when they could afford it long ago.

A prime example of this is the company which contracts the company I work for. I work for Valor Security, which is a contractor for General Growth Properties, which owns the mall I work at. In 2002, General Growth went on an expansion spree and ended up buying a competitor for $12 Billion (Yes, that's with a "B"). It also bought several other malls and properties throughout the US. Result - the company is $27.1 Billion in debt and is teetering on the brink of bankruptcy. The CEO is out, the CFO is out, and hundreds of people who depend on these operations for jobs are at risk. Where were the regulators? Where were the people to tell these idiots they were biting off more then they could chew? It incenses me that the so-called "conservatives" in this country are willing to risk my money and yours in financing these get rich quick schemes and then we end up holding the bag.

The Government probably might not do a better job, but at least we can elect them and hold them accountable. And, in the end, if its "too big to fail" at least there will be some sort of continuity until the problem gets fixed. The government operated system theoretically cannot fail and doesn't lead to an economic collapse.

This whole debacle also speaks to the fact that there should be a maximum size of a business. Maximum limits should be set on percentages of the market and ownership so that if a business goes under, it doesn't take the rest of the economy with it.

About Me

My photo
I am interested in CNG vehicles because they are good for the environment and aren't powered by dead Marines. I still have a little hope for the world. Read the musings and enjoy.